Over the past decade, the cost of the job guarantee scheme has risen sharply. In the last two decades, the government has spent 9.95 trillion rupees ($110.29 billion) on the programme, with about 80% of this coming in the past decade, Soumya Kanti Ghosh, chief economist at State Bank of India, said.
In the current financial year, the federal government allocated 860 billion rupees ($9.53 billion) for it. The revamp will force 40% of that cost onto states compared to 10% earlier. It will also ask states to bear 100% of the cost if funding required goes beyond an initially planned allocation.
Until now, the Act required the centre to increase allocations in line with demand, irrespective of an overshoot of any budgets.
"States lack the central government's financial capacity," Stiglitz, Piketty and other economists wrote.
"The new funding pattern creates a catastrophic Catch-22," they said, adding that poorer states will curb project approvals, stifling the availability of work where it is needed most.
India's official unemployment rate is low at 4.4% in rural areas but a decline in the availability of work under the job guarantee scheme could push up unemployment or push more workers to the farms, putting pressure on incomes.
The revamp is also coming at a time when the federal government has brought its finances under control, with its annual fiscal deficit targeted at 4.4% of GDP in the financial year ending March 31, 2026. It was more than double that in the year after the pandemic.
But state finances are looking stretched. Read this previous edition of the India File to know why.
The added burden of funding the job guarantee scheme will worsen these pressures, according to Madhavi Arora, chief economist at Mumbai-based brokerage Emkay Global Financial Services, who said the deficit for states is tracking 3.4% for the ongoing financial year.
To be sure, over the years, agencies including the country's top audit institution have flagged leakages and implementation concerns in the scheme.
SBI's Ghosh said the revamp seeks to tackle some of these concerns.
"The scheme is increasingly transitioning from a purely demand-driven framework towards one that emphasises outcomes, accountability and responsiveness to local needs," said Ghosh, adding that the increase in work guarantee to 125 days means the federal government will continue to spend on providing this backstop, with states supplementing it.
0 comentários:
Postar um comentário