Tecnologia do Blogger.
RSS

🗳️ Right to lie

Plus: 👀 How to spot misinfo | Sunday, September 29, 2024
 
Axios Open in app View in browser
 
 
Axios Twin Cities
By Torey Van Oot · Sep 29, 2024

Hi, there! We're back in your inbox with a look at one of the biggest challenges voters encounter each election cycle: false claims.

🎶 Sounds like: "Lyin' eyes," by The Eagles.

☕️ Situational awareness: It's National Coffee Day, and we've got a list of chains offering freebies and other deals to celebrate.

🎂 Happy birthday to our Axios Twin Cities members Don Pastor and Ethan McClelland!

Today's newsletter is 812 words, a 3-minute read.

 
 
1 big thing: 🤥 Why campaign lying is generally legal
By and
 
Illustration of a

Illustration: Sarah Grillo/Axios

 

As campaigns try to sway voters before the November election, they'll face few, if any, legal consequences for stretching the truth or telling outright lies, experts tell Axios.

Why it matters: Voters are about to get inundated with political TV ads, mailers and texts, many of them making dubious claims. But a long history of court rulings protects politicians' ability to lie in most cases.

What they're saying: The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that the First Amendment must protect speech that is false or misleading "to avoid chilling legitimate political discourse," Victor Menaldo, a University of Washington political science professor, tells Axios.

  • Because political speech is "foundational" under the First Amendment, "lies are not only protected, but even more so for politicians," he writes in an email.

Flashback: Several attempts to legislate against lying by politicians have been struck down by the courts.

  • In 2012, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down the Stolen Valor Act of 2005, a federal law that criminalized lying about receiving military honors.
  • Other courts have struck down efforts to regulate false political speech, including in Minnesota.

Yes, but: Under a relatively new state law, it is illegal to push AI-generated "deepfakes" meant to hurt a candidate or influence a race within 90 days of Election Day.

  • The law was one of the first in the nation to address growing concerns about the use of manipulated video, images and audio in campaigns.

Catch up fast: Courts have generally argued the antidote to false political statements should be "more speech" or "counterspeech" — essentially, relying on political opponents, the press or voters themselves to identify and call out campaign lies.

Between the lines: "We do have laws against defamation, but usually the burden is very, very high when it comes to public figures," Travis Ridout, a political science professor at Washington State University, tells Axios.

  • That provides lots of leeway for politicians to make exaggerated or misleading campaign claims.

The bottom line: Voters "should always be skeptical and never take what politicians say at face value," Menaldo writes.

  • "Politicians are not in the truth business, but in the power business," he says — and "quite often the truth is collateral damage."

Share this

Share on Facebook Tweet this Story Post to LinkedIn Post to LinkedIn Email this Story
 
 
2. How to spot election misinformation
By and
 
Illustration of a hand motioning

Illustration: Maura Losch/Axios

 

We've compiled some expert tips on how to spot (and guard against) false or misleading election claims, so you don't get sucked in by the memes.

1. Reverse image search that photo. Claims of voter fraud or election malfeasance are often accompanied by alleged photo evidence.

  • But if you run an image through Google's "search by image" function and see it used repeatedly in different contexts, that's a sign to dig deeper, Rachel Moran-Prestridge, a senior research scientist at UW's center, tells Axios.
  • At a minimum, it should "tell your brain that whatever you saw that image attached to is probably not the right context," she says.

2. Check other sources. State and county election officials' websites and social media accounts "are going to have accurate, trusted information," says Elizabeth Howard of the Brennan Center for Justice.

4. Be patient. It can take time for reporters and others to get to the bottom of whether a claim is true or false. If something you see seems unbelievable, it's smart to take a beat before sharing it more broadly.

Share on Facebook Tweet this Story Post to LinkedIn Post to LinkedIn Email this Story
 
 

A message from Axios

Reach Twin Cities readers
 
 

Get your brand in front of highly engaged readers in the Twin Cities.

What's in it for you:

  • Reach civic minded leaders and smart professionals.
  • Support local journalism with Axios Local.

Learn more about advertising with us.

 
 
3. 1 poll to go: Politicians get the blame
By
 
A bar chart that illustrates the types of misinformation U.S. adults are most concerned about, based on a poll of 2,122 respondents. Politicians spreading misinformation topped the list at 51%, followed by social media companies and AI deception at 35%. Concerns about foreign governments and divisive content are also notable.
Data: Axios/Harris Poll; Note: Respondents could select three options.; Chart: Axios Visuals

Americans' top concern around misinformation right now — more than foreign government interference or AI — is politicians spreading it to manipulate their supporters, according to a new Axios Vibes survey by The Harris Poll.

The big picture: 54% of respondents in the survey agreed with the statement, "I've disengaged from politics because I can't tell what's true."

  • Half of voters polled — and nearly two-thirds of non-voters — said when it comes to political news and the media, it's becoming too difficult for them to tell what is true and what is false.
  • That was more true for independents (58%) and Republicans (55%) compared with Democrats (39%).

Overall, when survey respondents were asked to identify up to three top concerns about misinformation, 51% identified politicians spreading misinformation to control their supporters.

What they're saying: "It's like, 'The call is coming from inside the house,'" said John Gerzema, CEO of The Harris Poll, recalling the old horror-movie refrain.

  • "It used to be, we were worried about China or Russia, fake ads or Facebook. Now, no, it's coming from the campaigns."

Zoom out: Eight in 10 voters said they believe that misinformation can significantly affect election outcomes, political discourse and civility.

The fine print: The Harris Poll is not affiliated with Vice President Harris.

Full story

Share on Facebook Tweet this Story Post to LinkedIn Post to LinkedIn Email this Story
 
 

A message from Axios

Reach Twin Cities readers
 
 

Get your brand in front of highly engaged readers in the Twin Cities.

What's in it for you:

  • Reach civic minded leaders and smart professionals.
  • Support local journalism with Axios Local.

Learn more about advertising with us.

 

📬 Torey wants to remind you that her inbox is open for tips about political mail or Minnesota ads featuring claims that seem suspicious or false: torey.vanoot@axios.com.

This newsletter was edited by Emma Hurt.

HQ
Want to help Axios Twin Cities grow? Become a member.
Support your local newsroom and gain access to exclusive insights from reporters, event invitations and more!
 

Axios thanks our partners for supporting our newsletters.
Sponsorship has no influence on editorial content.
Advertise with us.

Axios, PO Box 101060, Arlington VA 22201
 
You received this email because you signed up for newsletters from Axios.
To stop receiving this newsletter, unsubscribe or manage your email preferences.
 
Was this email forwarded to you?
Sign up now to get Axios in your inbox.
 

Follow Axios on social media:

Axios on Facebook Axios on X Axios on Instagram Axios on LinkedIn
 
 

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

0 comentários:

Postar um comentário