Which law schools aced the bar exam?

05:08 |

The Daily Docket

A newsletter by Reuters and Westlaw

By Caitlin Tremblay

Good morning. Today we have a look at the law schools with the highest bar exam pass rates. Plus, the 9th Circuit will tackle two NCAA antitrust cases; the Trump administration hired over 40 new immigration judges, many with enforcement experience; and is AI set to disrupt the billable hour? A large shinbone found in New Mexico belongs to a close relative of the T. Rex. Hope your Friday the 13th isn't too bone-chilling. Have a great weekend!

These U.S. law schools aced the bar exam in 2025

FOSSILFUEL-DIVESTMENT/ REUTERS/Beck Diefenbach

Stanford Law School posted the highest bar exam pass rate of any U.S. school in 2025, new data from the American Bar Association shows, in a year when exam results improved nationwide.

All but one of the Bay Area school's 176 graduates who took the exam for the first time last year passed—resulting in a pass rate of 99.43%. Yale Law School had the second-highest rate at 98.54%, followed closely by Duke Law School at 98.23%.

See how your law school did here.

Coming up today

Antitrust: The 9th Circuit will hear appeals in two cases challenging the NCAA's "five-year rule," where athletes are eligible to compete in no more than four seasons within five years of having enrolled in college. The cases were brought by two football players: former Memphis wide receiver Cortez Braham and former University of Nevada, Las Vegas defensive lineman Tatuo Martinson.
Bar exam: The trustees of the State Bar of California and the agency's Committee of Bar Examiners will meet today to discuss the future of California's bar exam and whether to continue to develop a state-specific test, or switch to the new national bar exam debuting this July. The state bar is still grappling with the fallout of its disastrous February 2025 online bar exam.

Court calendars are subject to last-minute docket changes.

Industry insight

The future of the billable hour was a burning question at the LegalWeek conference in New York this week, where AI is dominating the annual legal technology gathering. Read this week's Billable Hours.

"If the Great Dissenter's colleagues can remove her from the bench in this slipshod fashion, then other federal judges cannot be secure in their lifetime tenure."

—Mark Chenoweth of the New Civil Liberties Alliance, the attorney for U.S. Circuit Judge Pauline Newman, said in a statement after Newman petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday to hear her challenge to her ongoing suspension from a federal ‌appeals court in Washington. Newman told the justices that the Federal Circuit unconstitutionally removed her from her position during an investigation into her fitness. Read the petition.

42

That's how many new immigration judges the DOJ has hired as part of a push by the Trump administration to restock its ranks with people it dubs "deportation judges" after firing more than 100 others. Read more here.

In the courts

Tariffs: The U.S. government's four-part system for refunding $166 billion in illegal tariff payments with interest is between 40% and 80% complete, according to a court filing from a top customs official.
Social media: The 9th Circuit threw out an ‌injunction that had blocked California from enforcing a state law meant to shield ⁠children from online content that could harm them mentally or physically. Read the opinion.
Environment: The Trump administration sued the state of California, claiming the state's zero-emission vehicle and tailpipe greenhouse gas emissions ‌rules are illegal and preempted by federal law.
IP: Generic drugmaker Viatris settled a lawsuit brought by the family of Henrietta Lacks, a Maryland woman whose tissue samples were used without her permission to develop enduring cells for lucrative medical research. Read the filing.
Whistleblower: UBS agreed in principle to settle a lawsuit by whistleblower Trevor Murray, a former bond strategist who said the Swiss bank fired him in retaliation for refusing to publish misleading research reports, ending a long-running case that went to the U.S. Supreme Court.
IP: British visual-effects software company The Foundry Visionmongers sued Adobe in California federal court, arguing Adobe's Firefly Foundry suite of generative AI tools violates its trademark rights in the "Foundry" name. Read the complaint.
IP: SeaWorld Parks & Entertainment was sued by the nonprofit Sesame Workshop over its alleged refusal to honor its contractual obligations as the licensee of the 'Sesame Street' brand. Read more here.

Column: Ted Frank's turnaround: Driving a class action for motorists 'imprisoned' by a protest

Ted Frank, who is best-known for objecting to the terms of class action settlements, is pressing one of his own on behalf of drivers stuck for hours when pro-Palestinian protestors in 2024 blocked a highway near Chicago's O'Hare airport. Now, he and his colleagues at the non-profit Hamilton Lincoln Law Institute are appealing after a federal judge last year blasted their arguments as "baseless," dismissed the case with prejudice, and hit them with to-be-determined monetary sanctions. Jenna Greene has more in On the Case.

Attorney Analysis

Spencer West's Nate Garhart examines if Perplexity's "no volition" copyright strategy is a clever legal shield or a long shot. Read today's Attorney Analysis.

Additional writing by Shruthi Krishnamurthy.

Contact

Caitlin Tremblay

caitlin.tremblay@thomsonreuters.com

Sponsors are not involved in the creation of newsletters or other Reuters news content. Advertise in this newsletter or on Reuters' website

The Daily Docket is sent 5 days a week. Think your friend or colleague should know about us? Forward this newsletter to them. They can also sign up here.

Want to stop receiving this email? Unsubscribe here. To manage which newsletters you're signed up for, click here.

This email includes limited tracking for Reuters to understand whether you’ve engaged with its contents. For more information on how we process your personal information and your rights, please see our Privacy Statement.

Terms & Conditions